Your proposed hook, in contrast, is cluttered (lots of elements jostling for attention), which makes it hard to take in at a glance, and doesn't draw me in because it gives me all the information I need upfront. Chaosdruid ( talk) 03:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)Ī short, punchy hook is much more effective at drawing in readers – and leaving some degree of ambiguity makes it all the more compelling. Chaosdruid ( talk) 23:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC) No joy finding a ref as yet - have emailed the organisers of the festival in question, as the necessary page seems to have disappeared in a 2011 site-revamp. I did toy with many versions before posting this one, shorter ones and ones with different wording however, this is the one I want to go in DYK.
#Execution of gary glitter tv#
The main points are that he thought it was unfair he was executed, and OFCOM turned that down it also opened a debate on national TV about the (then) recent revelation that British people had flip-flopped from against to for the death penalty to displaying a 56% majority which supported hanging. that The Execution of Gary Glitter, broadcast in the UK on Channel 4, led Glitter to complain of unfair treatment?Īlso, the "awards" section needs a citation.
However, I think the proposed hook is kind of clunky, and not very hooky. However, where is the QPQ? Taylor Trescott - my talk + my edits 16:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)Ĭhaosdruid only has two DYK credits, so QPQ isn't necessary. Article has been suitably 5x expanded and DYK criteria is met.
that Gary Glitter's complaint to Ofcom was turned down after he was hanged in a mockumentary shown on British TV in 2009 called The Execution of Gary Glitter?ĥx expanded by Chaosdruid ( talk). Self nominated at 19:11, 1 October 2013 (UTC).
0 kommentar(er)
